that was not a tesserect. that was a 2d model of a 3d object. to see a 3d object you have to be able to see all side of an object at one facing the same direction, which nothing in a 3d universe can do. whenever we look at something we only see a flat picture. sure we see depth but we can only see the thing most in front of us.
Actually it is. It is a 3D model of what a tesserat is as we can see it since we can not truly see the 4th dimention. A true tesseract would be, in understandable terms, squaring a square in a repeated cycle that never ends. Although we can not see what this really looks like, the best we can do is create three dimentional “model” of what we perceive it to look like since we can only see things in a 3D way.
Anthonyk312
September 30th, 2009 at 4:23 am
that was not a tesserect. that was a 2d model of a 3d object. to see a 3d object you have to be able to see all side of an object at one facing the same direction, which nothing in a 3d universe can do. whenever we look at something we only see a flat picture. sure we see depth but we can only see the thing most in front of us.
kachinababe
September 30th, 2009 at 4:48 am
Actually it is. It is a 3D model of what a tesserat is as we can see it since we can not truly see the 4th dimention. A true tesseract would be, in understandable terms, squaring a square in a repeated cycle that never ends. Although we can not see what this really looks like, the best we can do is create three dimentional “model” of what we perceive it to look like since we can only see things in a 3D way.
kraken4u
September 30th, 2009 at 5:05 am
Neato! Upload some more!